Ah. Err, ok, I only saw the backpedaling. I retract my approval. ick.

I heartily approve of the concept of removing funding from lousy programming. But when that is used retroactively as an excuse for caving to idiots, then I'm doubly annoyed.

I guess I so wanted a company to 1) admit to doing a somewhat reasonable thing, but going about it badly (which happens a lot, but not in this case evidently) and 2) Use quality of programming as a factor, that I just believed it...

*sigh*