Ah. Err, ok, I only saw the backpedaling. I retract my approval. ick.
I heartily approve of the concept of removing funding from lousy programming. But when that is used retroactively as an excuse for caving to idiots, then I'm doubly annoyed.
I guess I so wanted a company to 1) admit to doing a somewhat reasonable thing, but going about it badly (which happens a lot, but not in this case evidently) and 2) Use quality of programming as a factor, that I just believed it...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2011-12-15 05:32 pm (UTC)I heartily approve of the concept of removing funding from lousy programming. But when that is used retroactively as an excuse for caving to idiots, then I'm doubly annoyed.
I guess I so wanted a company to 1) admit to doing a somewhat reasonable thing, but going about it badly (which happens a lot, but not in this case evidently) and 2) Use quality of programming as a factor, that I just believed it...
*sigh*